MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401620976 · doi:10.5194/gmd-17-6083-2024

A simple approach to represent precipitation-derived freshwater fluxes into nearshore ocean models: an FVCOM4.1 case study of Quatsino Sound, British Columbia

2024· article· en· W4401620976 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Krysten Rutherford, Laura Bianucci, William C. Floyd

Bibliographic record

VenueGeoscientific model development · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Canadian institutionsGovernment of British ColumbiaVancouver Island UniversityFisheries and Oceans Canada
FundersFisheries and Oceans Canada
KeywordsPrecipitationOceanographyClimatologySound (geography)Environmental scienceSimple (philosophy)MeteorologyGeologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. High-resolution numerical ocean models can be used to help interpret sparse observations in the nearshore and to help understand the impacts of climate change and extreme events on these dynamically complex coastal areas. However, these high-resolution ocean models require inputs with comparably high resolution, which is particularly difficult to achieve for freshwater discharge. Here, we explored a simple rain-based hydrological model as input into a high-resolution (≳ 13 m) model of Quatsino Sound – a fjord system located on the northwestern coast of Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada. Through a series of sensitivity tests using an application of the Finite Volume Community Ocean Model (FVCOM version 4.1), we found that model performance was hindered by the lack of knowledge of ungauged rivers and streams. In this case study, including the only major gauged river implied ignoring 538 other watersheds of various sizes and accounted for only about a quarter of the total estimated freshwater discharge. We found that including at least 60 % and ideally closer to 75 %–80 % of total freshwater fluxes gave similar model performance to including all possible 539 freshwater sources; in our model simulations, this percentage of freshwater flux meant including rivers with watersheds greater than 20–50 km2, corresponding to 7–19 total rivers. Further sensitivity tests also indicated that knowing the main outpour locations into the nearshore ocean is an important factor, but it is not as important as the total freshwater discharge included. Overall, this study illustrates the complexities of studying the land–ocean connection and offers a simple and accessible tool to help address a common problem in nearshore modelling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.289
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeoscientific model developmentSame topicOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesFrench-language works237,207