MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401628569 · doi:10.3174/ajnr.a8454

Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping in Adults with Persistent Postconcussion Symptoms after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: An Exploratory Study

2024· article· en· W4401628569 on OpenAlexafffund
Tiffany Bell, Muhammad Ansari, Julie M. Joyce, Leah J. Mercier, David G. Gobbi, Richard Frayne, Chantel T. Debert, Ashley D. Harris

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of Calgary
FundersCumming School of Medicine, University of CalgaryCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsConcussionMedicineTraumatic brain injuryQuantitative susceptibility mappingWhite matterInternal medicineMoodYoung adultPoison controlPsychiatryInjury preventionMagnetic resonance imaging

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: It is estimated that 18-30% of concussion sufferers experience symptoms lasting more than 1 month, known as persistent post-concussion symptoms (PPCS). Symptoms can be debilitating, and include headache, dizziness, nausea, problems with memory and concentration, sleep and mood disruption, and exercise intolerance. Previous studies have used quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) to show altered tissue susceptibility levels in adults acutely following concussion, however this finding has yet to be investigated in participants with PPCS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this exploratory case-controlled study, we measured tissue susceptibility using quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) in 24 participants with PPCS following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and 23 healthy controls with no history of concussion. We compute tissue susceptibility for seven white matter tracts and three deep grey matter regions and compare tissue susceptibility between groups using ANCOVA models controlling for age and sex. We also assess the relationship between regional tissue susceptibility and symptoms. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between tissue susceptibility in participants with PPCS compared to control subjects in any of the evaluated regions. However, we show lower tissue susceptibility across four white matter tracts was generally associated with worse symptoms in the PPCS group. Specifically, we saw relationships between white matter susceptibility and headache (p=0.006), time since injury (p=0.03), depressive symptoms (p=0.021) and daytime fatigue (p=0.01) in participants with PPCS. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide evidence in support of persistent changes in the brain months-to-years following injury and highlight the need to further understand the pathophysiology of PPCS, to determine effective prevention and treatment options. ABBREVIATIONS: ATR: Anterior Thalamic Radiation; Caud: Caudate; CCB: Corpus Callosum Body; CCG: Corpus Callosum Genus; CCS: Corpus Callosum Splenium; CH: Cingulum; DHI: Dizziness Handicap Inventory; ESS: Epworth Sleepiness Scale; FM: Forceps Minor; FSS: Fatigue Severity Scale; GAD: Generalized Anxiety Disorder; HIT-6: Headache Impact Test 6; IFOF: Inferior Fronto-Occipital Fasciculus; ILF: Inferior Longitudinal Fasciculus; mTBI: mild traumatic brain injury; Pal: Pallidum; PPCS: Persistent Post-Concussive Symptoms; PCSC: Postconcussional Syndrone Checklist; PHQ: Patient Health Questionnaire; Put: Putamen; RPQ: Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire; SLF: Superior Longitudinal Fasciculus; QSM: Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of NeuroradiologySame topicTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207