Família no neoliberalismo e nas suas alianças neoconservadoras
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O presente artigo tem por objetivo construir um diálogo entre as concepções historicizadas da família e do familismo no Serviço Social brasileiro (Mioto, 2010; Santos, 2017; Mioto et al., 2018, Silva e Teixeira, 2020) e as análises críticas contemporâneas do neoliberalismo de Brown (2006; 2015; 2021) e de Dardot e Laval (2016), que se aprofundam nas raízes históricas da construção teórica dos ideais neoliberais e, ainda problematizam a implementação dele no que se denominou neoliberalismo real. Aproxima-se, também, da filosofia marxista feminista de Fraser (2021) e crítica à captura de pautas e lutas progressistas pelo que denominou neoliberalismo progressista. Nessa conjuntura, busca-se identificar criticamente as chamadas alianças políticas de ocasião entre o neoliberalismo e setores religiosos conservadores que possibilitaram a ascensão e a operação de governos de extrema-direita pelo mundo, como demonstraram Brown (2021) nos Estados Unidos e Vaggione, Machado e Biroli (2020) no Brasil e na América Latina.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.033 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".