MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401631146 · doi:10.5435/jaaos-d-23-01208

Challenges of Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in Patients With Osteopetrosis

2024· review· en· W4401631146 on OpenAlexaff
Gautier Beckers, David Mazy, Pascal‐André Vendittoli, Mina W. Morcos, Vincent Massé

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBone Metabolism and Diseases
Canadian institutionsHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
FundersStryker
KeywordsOsteopetrosisMedicineArthroplastyPerioperativeOsteoarthritisMetabolic bone diseaseSurgeryDiseaseHip surgeryOsteoporosisInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Osteopetrosis is a rare metabolic bone disease, characterized by dysfunction of osteoclasts, resulting in increased bone density and brittleness leading to pathological fractures and bone deformities. Hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA) are common long-term complications in patients with osteopetrosis. Joint arthroplasty surgery remains an effective and recommended treatment for these patients with an end-stage OA because it provides favorable outcomes. However, in osteopetrosis, joint arthroplasty surgery carries an increased risk of complications, and specific preoperative and perioperative considerations are required to deal with the technical challenges related to the disease. The aim of this article was to review some of the key aspects of osteopetrosis, provide technical recommendations, and answer clinically relevant questions related to hip and knee arthroplasty surgery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSame topicBone Metabolism and DiseasesFrench-language works237,207