MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4401632883 · doi:10.22215/etd/2024-16020

Analytical Studies of Atmospheric Gravity Waves and Convection under the Anelastic Approximation

2024· dissertation· en· W4401632883 on OpenAlexafffund
Amna Mohamed Juma Grgar

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsConvectionGravity waveMechanicsPhysicsNonlinear systemInternal waveGravitational waveForcing (mathematics)ThermalClassical mechanicsInternal heatingMeteorologyAtmospheric sciences

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis provides a mathematical model that represents internal gravity waves and convection caused by heat forcing in the atmosphere.The ultimate goal is to investigate the mechanisms that generate internal gravity waves in the lower atmosphere due to deep heating and convection.We analyze a two-dimensional one-layer atmospheric model with two different configurations: first one with stable stratification and then one with unstable stratification.The governing equations are based on the equations for fluid mass, momentum, and energy conservation.A nonhomogeneous term in the energy conservation equation represents a thermal force.We investigate a configuration with stable stratification List of figures (3.1) Contour plot of the streamfunction perturbation ψ(x, z, t) of the gravity waves generated by a thermal forcing in the domain 0 ≤ z ≤ 10 when ū constant with k = 2 and b = 0.2..........................

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics→French-language works237,207→