MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401632956 · doi:10.22215/etd/2024-16072

Against the Elements: Reconceiving Public Libraries as a Place of Refuge

2024· dissertation· en· W4401632956 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nupur Agrawal

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLibrary Science and Administration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTypologyInfillWork (physics)Political sciencePopulationGeographyArchitectural engineeringEngineeringSociologyCivil engineeringArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The library typology has significantly transformed over the past half century, introducing makerspaces, multimedia hubs, and amenities well beyond repositories for printed resources. Amidst the housing and climate crisis, libraries have also become important spaces of temporary refuge for those experiencing homelessness or extreme weather events. Exploring these intricacies in Ottawa—a city with a staggering 20% annual population growth in need of new civic amenities— this thesis proposes a new library typology for a Lowertown infill site—one better serving the needs of our entire community. The work provides an analysis of various innovative programming to benefit future libraries. The result is a novel paradigm for public libraries as more inclusive and climate conscious places of learning, gathering, and refuge in Ontario.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.925
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLibrary Science and AdministrationFrench-language works237,207