MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4401633681 · doi:10.1117/12.3017858

Optical characterization of aluminum-based 280 GHz CCAT MKID pixels and arrays

2024· article· en· W4401633681 on OpenAlexaff
Anna Vaskuri, Jordan Wheeler, Jason E. Austermann, Michael Vissers, James A. Beall, James Burgoyne, Victoria Butler, Scott C. Chapman, Steve K. Choi, A. T. Crites, Cody J. Duell, Rodrigo Freundt, Anthony I. Huber, Zachary B. Huber, Johannes Hubmayr, Lawrence Lin, Alicia Middleton, Michael D. Niemack, Thomas Nikola, D. Scott, Adrian K. Sinclair, Ema Smith, G. J. Stacey, Joel N. Ullom, Jeffrey van Lanen, Eve M. Vavagiakis, Samantha Walker, Bugao Zou

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSuperconducting and THz Device Technology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCosmic microwave backgroundDetectorOpticsMicrowavePhysicsTinMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsTitanium nitrideNitrideNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present the first full-array optical characterizations of the 280 GHz aluminum-based superconducting microwave kinetic inductance detector (MKID) arrays developed at NIST, CO, USA for the CCAT Collaboration for observing galactic ecology, Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect, galaxy evolution, and line intensity mapping. The main advantage of aluminum MKIDs is their lower 1/f noise compared to the alternative choice of titanium-nitride (TiN) MKIDs, which would reduce systematic drifts when mapping the sky. We will present the spectral response, polarization characteristics, detector efficiency, and noise equivalent power (NEP) under the relevant conditions for these detectors. Two aluminum and one TiN MKID arrays will form the detector arrays in the 280 GHz instrument module of the Prime-Cam. First light observations are expected in 2025.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSuperconducting and THz Device Technology→French-language works237,207→