MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401634150 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2024.3445172

Investigating the Effect of Distance and TXOP Allocation Limit in IEEE 802.11bd Networks

2024· article· en· W4401634150 on OpenAlexaff
Farzaneh Abdolahi, Jelena Mišić, Vojislav B. Mišić

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Networks and Protocols
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkChannel (broadcasting)Markov chainNetwork packetPrioritizationTransmission (telecommunications)ThroughputWirelessTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The recent IEEE 802.11bd communication technology allows next-generation vehicle (NGV) devices to make use of wide channels using channel bonding, both with and without fallback, in addition to multiple packet transmission using transmission opportunity (TXOP) allocation. To evaluate its performance in an environment which also contains legacy or non-NGV devices that do not support TXOP allocation, we develop a detailed analytical model through probabilistic modeling and Markov chain analysis. The model includes data rate scaling with distance from the roadside unit (RSU). Performance analysis provided by the model shows that enhanced distributed channel access (EDCA), which is available for both NGV and legacy devices, provides noticeable prioritization of traffic; that TXOP allocation leads to better performance by an amount which depends on the traffic priority level; and that NGV devices that use fallback experience better performance than either legacy devices or NGV devices that do not use fallback.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicWireless Networks and ProtocolsFrench-language works237,207