High-Resolution Tropical Cyclone Rainfall Detection From C-Band SAR Imagery With Deep Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article introduces an innovative deep-learning approach for retrieving tropical cyclone (TC) rainfall information from C-band Sentinel-1 synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imagery. We collected 17 SAR images under TC conditions from 2016 to 2021 and matched them with synchronous observational Next Generation Weather Radar (NEXRAD) Level-III data, forming a dataset of 302689 data pairs for model development. The model inputs include SAR-measured physical parameters in normalized radar cross section (NRCS), texture features represented by the gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM), and statistical parameters of VV-polarized NRCS. A deep-learning-based TC rain rate retrieval (TC3R) model, combining a convolutional network and a fully connected (FC) network, was developed to retrieve quantitative TC rainfall information effectively. The test results demonstrate that the TC3R model can offer reasonable and stable quantitative rainfall estimation, particularly effectively detecting areas with medium-to-heavy rainfall events (2.5–40 mm/h) in SAR images where the NRCS is significantly affected by rain. Furthermore, to offer valuable insights into the performance of the TC3R model, we analyzed results across TC events of different intensities as case studies. Our results show high structural similarity (SSIM) in rainfall patterns between SAR and NEXRAD across all cases, consistently achieving SSIM values above 0.67. Moreover, in areas where SAR signals are notably affected by rainfall, the SSIM index even exceeds 0.80. Finally, our model’s performance was evaluated by comparing its results with the independent global precipitation measurement (GPM) data, demonstrating effective rainfall prediction, particularly for the primary spiral rain band, in the two cases analyzed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".