Arctic Wintertime Sea Ice Lead Detection From Sentinel-1 SAR Images
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Leads are almost linear fractures within the ice pack, which are commonly observed in polar regions. In wintertime, leads promote energy flux from the underlying ocean to the atmosphere. Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) can monitor leads at a finer spatial resolution than other spaceborne datasets, regardless of solar illumination and atmospheric conditions. However, the SAR-based lead detection methods proposed to date are restricted to some specific areas, instead of the entire Arctic. In this article, we present a generalized deep learning-based approach for automatic sea ice lead detection (SILDET) in the Arctic wintertime using Sentinel-1 SAR images. The validation results show that SILDET has the capability of detecting open and frozen leads at different stages of development. Compared with the visual interpretation of Sentinel-1 images, the overall detection accuracy is 97.80% and the Kappa coefficient is 0.88. The lead map of a regional study obtained from SILDET was compared to that from a previous SAR-based lead detection method and a lead dataset based on Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) data. The lead map was also validated using Sentinel-2 images. The result shows that SILDET can provide a more detailed distribution of leads and a better estimation of lead width and area. SILDET was applied to present the Arctic-wide lead distribution from January to April 2023 with a spatial resolution of 40 m. The Arctic-wide lead width distribution follows a power law with an average exponent of 1.65. The SILDET approach can be expected to provide long-term high-resolution lead distribution records.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".