MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401637481 · doi:10.31579/2693-4779/181

Reasons for the formation of scoliosis, a factor in the functioning of the body

2024· article· en· W4401637481 on OpenAlexaff
Gusyev Valentyn

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Research and Clinical Trials · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfrared Thermography in Medicine
Canadian institutionsPedorthic Research Foundation of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScoliosisPsychologyFactor (programming language)Physical medicine and rehabilitationOrthodonticsDevelopmental psychologyPsychoanalysisMedicinePsychiatryComputer scienceProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Speaking about the causes of disturbances in the functioning of the self-regulatory system that is our body, the question arises: why does it get sick? Each doctor will give you hundreds of factors, not forgetting to mention heredity. But our forefathers lived up to 150 - 300 years. At the celebrations dedicated to the centenary of the Battle of Borodino in 1992, many such centenarians were present. Academician Bekhtereva N.P. She said that in our time there are many such people. She explained this phenomenon by the presence of program matrices in the brain, which fail over the years. Not everyone today knows that the renewal of brain cells and their charging occurs from the muscles of the body that are tired during the day. But today human activity has decreased by 200 times.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.090
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.189
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.551
Threshold uncertainty score0.937

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0900.189
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.572
GPT teacher head0.626
Teacher spread0.054 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Research and Clinical TrialsSame topicInfrared Thermography in MedicineFrench-language works237,207