INTERNATIONAL COMPETITIVENESS OF THE EXPORT BUSINESS OF CONCENTRATED APPLE JUICE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The size of the international market for apple juice concentrate (JCM) is USD 2000 million.The main actors are China, Poland and Turkey, which explain 55% of the participation, while Chile has a share of 3.7%.Due to the high competition of this economic activity, it is relevant to analyze the competitiveness of this agroindustry.The objective of this work was to determine the competitiveness of the Chilean JCM export business.A total of 8 competitiveness indicators were determined for 32 countries, with greater appreciation in exports, in the period 2015-2019: Revealed comparative advantage index, Tradability, Degree of export openness, Degree of import penetration, Market specialization index, Distance between the supplier and the buyer, Lafay Index and Market Insertion Matrix.These were assigned a score to prepare a ranking, in which Poland, Chile and Serbia stand out as the most competitive countries.Potential markets (Canada, India, Netherlands, Russia and Spain) were identified through an international demand matrix.Chile is a competitive country in the export of JCM, however, trade agreements do not provide greater competitiveness, because other suppliers sell at lower prices and/or are located at a shorter distance from the destination.The fact that the Chilean supply is not burdened with tariffs is not enough.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".