MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401649637 · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125120

Logic-oriented fuzzy neural networks: A survey

2024· article· en· W4401649637 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Systems with Applications · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceFuzzy logicArtificial neural networkArtificial intelligenceNeuro-fuzzyMachine learningFuzzy control system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• The work presents a comprehensive review and discussion of logic-oriented fuzzy AND\OR network. • The architecture exhibits outstanding learning and interpretation capabilities. • Logic-oriented neurons are endowed with clearly delineated logic structure. • Interpretability is the main advantage of the neurons that make the model linguistically readable. • Knowledge is extracted in the form that is easily comprehended by humans. Data analysis and their thorough interpretation have posed a substantial challenge in the era of big data due to increasingly complex data structures and their sheer volumes. The black-box nature of neural networks may omit important information about why certain predictions have been made which makes it difficult to ground the reliability of a prediction despite tremendous successes of machine learning models. Therefore, the need for reliable decision-making processes stresses the significance of interpretable models that eliminate uncertainty, supporting explainability while maintaining high generalization capabilities. Logic-oriented fuzzy neural networks are capable to cope with a fundamental challenge of fuzzy system modeling. They strike a sound balance between accuracy and interpretability because of the underlying features of the network components and their logic-oriented characteristics. In this survey, we conduct a comprehensive review of logic-oriented fuzzy neural networks with a special attention being directed to AND\OR architecture. The architectures under review have shown promising results, as reported in the literature, especially when extracting useful knowledge through building experimentally justifiable models. Those models show balance between accuracy and interpretability because of the prefect integration between the merits of neural networks and fuzzy logic which has led to reliable decision-making processes. The survey discusses logic-oriented networks from different perspectives and mainly focuses on the augmentation of interpretation through vast array of learning abilities. This work is significantly important due to the lack to similar survey in the literature that discusses this particular architecture in depth. Finally, we stress that the architecture could offer a novel promising processing environment if they are integrated with other fuzzy tools which we have discussed thoroughly in this paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score0.683

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it