MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401654599 · doi:10.1177/1420326x241270775

Parameter-input estimation of RC thermal models of buildings using unscented Kalman filter and nonlinear least square method

2024· article· en· W4401654599 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIndoor and Built Environment · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsKalman filterControl theory (sociology)Nonlinear systemExtended Kalman filterEstimation theoryEngineeringComputer scienceAlgorithmMathematicsStatisticsControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Effective building energy management (e.g. temperature control strategies) necessitates reliable and computationally efficient building thermal models. One type of them is the resistor-capacitor (RC) model. However, estimating model parameters and inputs (e.g. solar heat gain) simultaneously is challenging, especially when some of the temperature states are missing due to instrumentation limitations and/or sensor malfunctions. The present study utilizes unscented Kalman filter (UKF) and nonlinear least squares (NLSs) methods for parameters and input estimation of RC models with possible unavailable temperature states. The estimation procedure, mathematical operations and result analysis are presented in detail. To evaluate the capability of the method, two case studies were conducted. The first case study involved a simple, made-up RC model with known parameters, inputs and states, while the second case study used monitored data from a single detached house. The capability of the method was evaluated by comparing the estimated parameters, inputs and states to the corresponding true values in both study cases. The performance evaluation shows that the proposed method can effectively estimate RC model parameters and inputs, even with certain missing states. The proposed method can be employed for timely online updating of RC model parameters to improve response prediction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.325
Threshold uncertainty score0.454

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it