MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401655027 · doi:10.1515/9781501771866-014

12. Who Stands in the Digital Shadows?: “City of Refuge” at the Intersection of “Old” and “New” Media in the Age of the Digital Humanities

2024· book-chapter· en· W4401655027 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Marcus P. Nevius

Bibliographic record

VenueCornell University Press eBooks · 2024
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicDigital Humanities and Scholarship
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEmory UniversityUniversity of PennsylvaniaYork UniversityRice UniversityUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillYale University
KeywordsIntersection (aeronautics)Digital humanitiesHumanitiesGeographyComputer scienceCartographyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

12. Who Stands in the Digital Shadows?: “City of Refuge” at the Intersection of “Old” and “New” Media in the Age of the Digital Humanities was published in American Revolutions in the Digital Age on page 220.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score0.118

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0150.011
Scholarly communication0.0130.012
Open science0.0010.009
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0350.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.100 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCornell University Press eBooksSame topicDigital Humanities and ScholarshipFrench-language works237,207