MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401664741 · doi:10.33002/jelp040201

The Basel Convention and Ship Decommissioning in the Economically Disadvantaged Nations: Bangladeshi Perspective

2024· article· en· W4401664741 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ahmed Ishtiaque

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Environmental Law & Policy · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMarine and Offshore Engineering Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnforcementConventionBusinessSustainabilityHazardous wasteInternational tradeEnvironmental planningEngineeringPolitical scienceLawWaste management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bangladesh, the largest producer of steel from decommissioned ships, is the most dominant player in the global shipbreaking industry. However, managing hazardous waste generated from ship disposal remains a significant concern for the local and international communities. Bangladesh ratified both the relevant international treaties namely the Hong Kong Convention and the Basel Convention and incorporated their provisions in its domestic system. However, the country's waste management practices particularly at the downstream level are hindered by insufficient enforcement of the national waste policy, fragmented responsibilities for waste operators, generators, and transporters, and lack of technical guidelines and procedures. Using a comparative research methodology and a multimodal decision-making model namely the Analytical Hierarchy Process, this article attempts to single out laws and policies that need to be addressed by Bangladesh to fulfill its mandates under international laws, particularly the Basel Convention and effectively contribute to the sustainability in the global shipbreaking industry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.915
Threshold uncertainty score0.209

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Environmental Law & PolicySame topicMarine and Offshore Engineering StudiesFrench-language works237,207