MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401665017 · doi:10.1016/j.jadr.2024.100832

Personality and cognitive factors implicated in depression and anxiety in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2024· review· en· W4401665017 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rebekah Davenport, Isabel Krug, Nicole Rickerby, Phuong Linh Dang, Elizabeth Forte, Litza Kiropoulos

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Affective Disorders Reports · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMultiple Sclerosis AustraliaAustralian Government
KeywordsMeta-analysisAnxietyDepression (economics)PersonalityClinical psychologyPsychologyMultiple sclerosisCognitionPsychiatryMedicineSocial psychologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Depression and anxiety are prevalent among persons living with multiple sclerosis (plwMS) and are linked to negative prognostic outcomes. Cognitive theories posit that personality and cognitive factors confer risk for depression and anxiety. This meta-analytic review aimed to synthesise evidence on personality and cognitive factors related to depression and anxiety in MS and determine whether sociodemographic and clinical variables moderate factor-symptom relations. Methods: This systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression was prospectively registered (CRD42020192253). Publications were identified through database searches (Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, WebofScience, Proquest) and considered if they included a sample of individuals with clinically definite MS (age ≥11 years) and a measure of depression or anxiety and a personality or cognitive factor. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was applied to assess methodological rigor. Results: A total of 99 studies were included in the narrative synthesis (97 samples; N= 13,609; Mage= 44.20±7.26), with 77 contributing effects on 24 factors for random-effects meta-analyses. The most robust relationships were between depression and anxiety and higher neuroticism, lower extraversion, emotion dysregulation, and illness perceptions of serious MS consequences and a strong MS identity (r's=0.28–0.59). A set of factors exhibited specificity for depression, including psychological inflexibility (r= 0.62) and optimism (r= -0.43). Relationships varied as a function of age, gender, and MS-type. Limitations: Limited data availability prevented evaluation of heterogeneity in all cases, and prospective conclusions. Exclusion criteria in the included studies reduced the generalisability findings. Conclusions: Findings highlight shared and distinct factors implicated in depression and anxiety, offering insights for tailored interventions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.026
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.026
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0160.033
Bibliometrics0.0080.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.133
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Affective Disorders ReportsSame topicMultiple Sclerosis Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207