MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401665017 · doi:10.1016/j.jadr.2024.100832

Personality and cognitive factors implicated in depression and anxiety in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2024· review· en· W4401665017 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Affective Disorders Reports · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMultiple Sclerosis AustraliaAustralian Government
KeywordsMeta-analysisAnxietyDepression (economics)PersonalityClinical psychologyPsychologyMultiple sclerosisCognitionPsychiatryMedicineSocial psychologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Depression and anxiety share a common core of personality and cognitive factors. • Depression may be partially discriminated by a specific set of traits and cognitive factors. • Relationships varied as a function of age, gender, and MS type, highlighting the importance of variables in formulating depression and anxiety. • Future research is needed for higher quality research with adequate reporting on participant characteristics, elevated levels of depression and anxiety, and multimorbidities. Depression and anxiety are prevalent among persons living with multiple sclerosis (plwMS) and are linked to negative prognostic outcomes. Cognitive theories posit that personality and cognitive factors confer risk for depression and anxiety. This meta-analytic review aimed to synthesise evidence on personality and cognitive factors related to depression and anxiety in MS and determine whether sociodemographic and clinical variables moderate factor-symptom relations. This systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression was prospectively registered (CRD42020192253). Publications were identified through database searches (Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, WebofScience, Proquest) and considered if they included a sample of individuals with clinically definite MS (age ≥11 years) and a measure of depression or anxiety and a personality or cognitive factor. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was applied to assess methodological rigor. A total of 99 studies were included in the narrative synthesis (97 samples; N = 13,609; M age = 44.20±7.26), with 77 contributing effects on 24 factors for random-effects meta-analyses. The most robust relationships were between depression and anxiety and higher neuroticism, lower extraversion, emotion dysregulation, and illness perceptions of serious MS consequences and a strong MS identity ( r 's=0.28–0.59). A set of factors exhibited specificity for depression, including psychological inflexibility ( r = 0.62) and optimism ( r = -0.43). Relationships varied as a function of age, gender, and MS-type. Limited data availability prevented evaluation of heterogeneity in all cases, and prospective conclusions. Exclusion criteria in the included studies reduced the generalisability findings. Findings highlight shared and distinct factors implicated in depression and anxiety, offering insights for tailored interventions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.631
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0100.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.133
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it