MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401665285 · doi:10.1016/j.sbsr.2024.100681

Biosensing in the optical switch configuration on strong plasmonic gratings enabling differential referenced detection

2024· article· en· W4401665285 on OpenAlexafffund
Emilie Laffont, Arnaud Valour, Nicolas Crespo‐Monteiro, Pierre Berini, Yves Jourlin

Bibliographic record

VenueSensing and Bio-Sensing Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPlasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaConseil Régional d'AuvergneAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsBiosensorDetection limitGratingMaterials scienceOpticsAnalytePlasmonOptoelectronicsComputer sciencePhysicsNanotechnologyChemistryChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A deep gold-coated sinusoidal grating is proposed as a transducer for label-free real-time biosensing, operating in a new configuration based on the optical switch effect, which produces complementary optical outputs enabling differential and referenced detection. Biosensing experiments are reported for the first time on this platform, using immunoassays involving biospecific pairs consisting of bovine serum albumin and its antibody, and human serum albumin and its antibody. Direct and sandwich immunoassays are demonstrated along with negative controls. A limit of detection of 6 pg/mm 2 was obtained. A theoretical model correlating the variation in the differential referenced output optical signal with adlayer growth is presented and supports the experimental results. The proposed detection device operating in the optical switch configuration makes a promising case for point-of-care detection applications because the differential detection of two diffracted orders enables common noise suppression and robust interrogation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSensing and Bio-Sensing ResearchSame topicPlasmonic and Surface Plasmon ResearchFrench-language works237,207