MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Spaln3: improvement in speed and accuracy of genome mapping and spliced alignment of protein query sequences

2024· article· en· W4401666005 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Osamu Gotoh

Bibliographic record

VenueBioinformatics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of GeneticsNational Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology
KeywordsVectorization (mathematics)Computer scienceSIMDGenomeMultiple sequence alignmentSequence (biology)Smith–Waterman algorithmDynamic programmingSequence alignmentAlignment-free sequence analysisSpeedupComputational biologyReference genomeParallel computingGeneAlgorithmGeneticsBiologyPeptide sequence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MOTIVATION: Spaln is the earliest practical tool for self-sufficient genome mapping and spliced alignment of protein query sequences onto a mammalian-sized eukaryotic genomic sequence. However, its computational speed has become inadequate for the analysis of rapidly growing genomic and transcript sequence data. RESULTS: The dynamic programming calculation of Spaln has been sped up in two ways: (i) the introduction of the multi-intermediate unidirectional Hirschberg method and (ii) SIMD-based vectorization. The new version, Spaln3, is ∼7 times faster than the latest Spaln version 2, and its gene prediction accuracy is consistently higher than that of Miniprot. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/ogotoh/spaln.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBioinformaticsSame topicGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesFrench-language works237,207