Structural, Biochemical, and Phylogenetic Analysis of Bacterial and Fungal Carbohydrate Esterase Family 15 Glucuronoyl Esterases in the Rumen
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Glucuronoyl esterases (GEs) are carbohydrate active enzymes in carbohydrate esterase family 15 which are involved in the hydrolysis of lignin-carbohydrate complexes. They are encoded by a wide range of aerobic and anaerobic fungi and bacteria inhabiting diverse environments. The rumen microbiome is a complex microbial community with a wide array of enzymes that specialize in deconstructing plant cell wall carbohydrates. Enzymes from the rumen tend to show low similarity to homologues found in other environments, making the rumen microbiome a promising source for the discovery of novel enzymes. Using a combination of phylogenetic and structural analysis, we investigated the structure-function relationship of GEs from the rumen bacteria Fibrobacter succinogenes and Ruminococcus flavefaciens, and from the rumen fungus, Piromyces rhizinflata. All adopt a canonical α/β hydrolase fold and possess a structurally conserved Ser-His-Glu/Asp catalytic triad. Structural variations in the enzymes are localized to loops surrounding the active site. Analysis of the active site structures in these enzymes emphasized the importance of structural plasticity in GEs with non-canonical active site conformations. We hypothesize that interkingdom HGT events may have contributed to the diversity of GEs in the rumen, and this is demonstrated by the phylogenetic and structural similarity observed between rumen bacterial and fungal GEs. This study advances our understanding of the structure-function relationship in glucuronoyl esterases and illuminates the evolutionary dynamics that contribute to enzyme diversity in the rumen microbiome.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".