Implementing Triage-Bot: Supporting the Current Practice for Triage Nurses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Canada, emergency departments (ED) have 15.1 million unscheduled visits every year; this has been suggested to indicate that patients rely on ED to address the gaps experienced by 6.5 million Canadians who lack a primary care provider. When this large number of visits is coupled with a predicted shortage of 100,000 nurses in Canada by 2030, ED can be expected to face resource limitations, which highlights the importance of triage systems as a source of immediate support. Technology that incorporates innovative analytical methods, automation of routine, and efficient processing can be leveraged to enhance patient outcomes, streamline clinical processes, and improve the overall quality and efficiency of healthcare delivery. This paper aims to highlight how the Triage-Bot, a proposed AI system, can assist ED nurses when triaging patients. The Triage-Bot system is based on the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS), which currently serves as a standardized and highly effective tool for prioritizing patient care in emergency departments across the country. Pre-set and open-ended questions are asked using voice and video, allowing patients to describe their health concerns and conditions. Triage-Bot automatically measures the following vital signs: heart rate (HR), heart rate variability (HRV), oxygen saturation (SpO2), respiratory rate (RR), blood pressure (BP), blood glucose (BG), and stress. The system uses artificial intelligence models, particularly those with a deep learning approach that simultaneously analyzes both the user's facial expression and voice tone. Implementation: A systematic review addressed the implications of AI in nursing and concluded that it could contribute to patient care by providing personalized instructions and/or remotely monitoring patients. The Triage-Bot system can be implemented in healthcare facilities, such as emergency department waiting rooms. The information it collects can then be added to a patient's health records to support nurses in assessing the severity of each patient's condition. Limitations: If the system is accessed without a nurse's guidance, it is imperative that the user receives information regarding when to visit a healthcare provider or ED. Continuous improvements in Triage-Bot's accessibility for patients with varying abilities are required to ensure that the system remains user-friendly during times of illness. The voice and text interaction can also be influenced by a user's understanding of language, culture, and age-related factors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".