MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4401676347 · doi:10.35772/ghmo.2024.01008

2020 and 2021 web-based training program on children's mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic

2024· article· en· W4401676347 on OpenAlexaff
Crystal Amiel M. Estrada, Masahide Usami, Naoko Satake, Ernesto R. Gregorio, Ma Cynthia R Leynes, Norieta Balderrama, Japhet Fernandez de Leon, Rhodora Andrea Concepcion, Cecile Tuazon Timbalopez, Vanessa Kathleen Cainghug, Noa Tsujii, Ikuhiro Harada, Jiro Masuya, Hiroaki Kihara, Kazuhiro Kawahara, Yuta Yoshimura, Yuuki Hakoshima, Jun Kobayashi

Bibliographic record

VenueGHM Open · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCOVID-19 and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsChild, Adolescent and Family Mental Health
FundersNational Center for Mental HealthNational Center for Global Health and Medicine
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PandemicMental health2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)PsychologyMedical educationMedicineVirologyPsychiatryOutbreak

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

COVID-19 adversely affected mental health care and service delivery globally. Continuing its thrust on improving child and adolescent mental health, the National Center for Global Health and Medicine conducted a training program in collaboration with the University of the Ryukyus, University of the Philippines Manila, the National Center for Mental Health, and the Philippine Society of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry in 2020 and 2021 to discuss the situation, challenges, and good practices in mental health treatment, care, and promotion for children and adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic. Composed of 15 on-demand lectures and a webinar on three general mental health themes, the training identified the need for strengthening the provision of care not only in specialized health facilities but also in empowering communities in addressing children and adolescent mental health concerns. Collaboration between different stakeholders is needed to ensure child and adolescent well-being during public health emergencies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.116

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0350.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.465
Teacher spread0.366 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGHM Open→Same topicCOVID-19 and Mental Health→French-language works237,207→