Map matching on low sampling rate trajectories through deep inverse reinforcement learning and multi-intention modeling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Analyzing freight vehicle movements using GPS trajectory data presents challenges due to environmental conditions and hardware limitations impacting data accuracy. Map matching, the process of aligning GPS signals with road networks, facilitates accurate route reconstruction. However, existing methods have limitations, particularly with low and ultra-low sampling rates. They often assume the shortest path between points, overlook historical data insights and neglect diverse driving behaviors, which may not align with real-world scenarios where shortest paths are not always optimal and different drivers exhibit varied behaviors. These limitations affect existing methods’ reliability, especially when we face low sampling rate trajectories. In this study, we propose multi-intention deep inverse reinforcement learning for map matching (MIDIRL) to address these challenges. MIDIRL integrates deep neural networks and multi-intention capturing mechanisms with inverse reinforcement learning to model complex driving preferences from historical trajectories, improving map matching accuracy, especially in ultra-low-frequency trajectories. Our experiments on real-world datasets demonstrate MIDIRL’s improved accuracy and efficiency of map matching compared to previous methods, even with limited training data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".