MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401684476 · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c01221

Machine Learning for High-Throughput Configuration Sampling of Li−La−Ti−O Disordered Solid-State Electrolyte

2024· article· en· W4401684476 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMachine Learning in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsElectrolyteThroughputSolid-stateSampling (signal processing)Materials scienceComputer scienceHigh-throughput screeningChemical engineeringChemistryNanotechnologyEngineeringPhysical chemistryElectrodeTelecommunicationsBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Most solid-state lithium electrolytes are disordered ionic crystalline materials that possess crystallographic sites that can be vacant or occupied by different ions. The presence of these partially occupied sites enables lithium diffusion through their lattice and makes such materials promising for developing all-solid batteries. High-throughput computational screening of such materials must bypass costly DFT sampling of disordered configurations and, therefore, commonly relies on the computationally efficient Coulomb approximation to find just a few representative low-energy ionic configurations, for which DFT is then used to quickly predict a number of important materials’ properties, such as the electrochemical stability window. This work demonstrates, using the Li−La−Ti−O solid electrolyte (LLTO) as an example, that the Coulomb approximation fails to correctly detect the most stable arrangement of Li and La ions in the LLTO, which has a noticeable impact on the accuracy of subsequent computational prediction of the electrochemical stability window of the material. The analysis herein shows that the sampling problem arises from the relatively modest geometry relaxation of the LLTO lattice. A kernel ridge regression machine learning (ML) method employing the smooth overlap of atomic positions as a structure descriptor (SOAP-KRR) leads to significant improvements in detecting the most stable configurations of the LLTO. The universal ML potential based on the multiple atomic cluster expansion is also found to be reliable but to a lesser extent than SOAP-KRR. Remarkably, accurate energies can be obtained with SOAP-RKK trained on as few as 40 LLTO structures, making this method promising for designing force matching ML potentials that can serve as a computationally inexpensive alternative to the costly DFT structure relaxation in high-throughput screening of large data sets of ionic materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.439

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it