<i>TEMP:</i> Cost-Aware Two-Stage Energy Management for Electrical Vehicles Empowered by Blockchain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Developing effective platforms for economic energy management is considered a pivotal issue in the field of electric vehicles (EVs). To implement a cost-effective energy management platform (EMP), developers must overcome two major challenges. The first challenge lies in the environmental dynamic nature, such as EV location, energy price fluctuations, storage levels, and parking availability at charging stations. This causes most traditional one-shot optimizations to fail. The second challenge pertains to the lack of regulation in EV energy exchanges. To address these challenges, we propose a cost-aware two-stage EMP based on blockchain and deep reinforcement learning (DRL), namely, TEMP. Specifically, TEMP first develops a sharding-based blockchain energy management framework, which guarantees trust, security, privacy, traceability, and accountability without the need for intermediaries. Then, considering the complex and high-dimensional environment, TEMP devises a two-stage cooperative scheduling scheme by combining ant colony optimization (ACO) with proximal policy optimization (PPO) to enhance learning effectiveness. Evaluations show that TEMP outperforms the two state-of-the-art baselines by 12.3% and 4.4% in terms of long-term profits while reducing costs by 6.7% and 2.8%, respectively. Moreover, energy transaction efficiency can be ensured when the EV number of blockchain networks is gradually increased.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".