MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401687402 · doi:10.1109/tccn.2024.3445380

Joint Design for RIS-Aided ISAC via Deep Unfolding Learning

2024· article· en· W4401687402 on OpenAlexaff
Jifa Zhang, Mingqian Liu, Jie Tang, Nan Zhao, Dusit Niyato, Xianbin Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced SAR Imaging Techniques
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceJoint (building)Computer architectureEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) has become a promising technique to alleviate the spectrum congestion via sharing the same spectrum for communication and sensing. Nevertheless, many ISAC schemes encounter the challenges of high computational complexity. Thanks to the powerful non-linear fitting capabilities and fast inference speed, deep learning is expected to facilitate the online deployment of ISAC. In this paper, we propose a dual-functional waveform design scheme for reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS) aided ISAC based on deep unfolding learning. Specifically, the weighted sum of multi-user interference energy and waveform discrepancy is minimized via the joint waveform and phase-shift design. We first develop an alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) based iterative algorithm to handle the non-convex optimization problem. Then, we develop a deep unfolding neural network (NN), named ADMM-NET, which unfolds the proposed ADMM-based iterative algorithm to a layer-wise architecture and replaces the matrix inversions with low-complexity approximations. In addition, we present a black-box NN for performance comparison. Simulation results verify that the ADMM-NET outperforms the black-box NN in performance, interpretability and training samples. Moreover, the ADMM-NET is superior to the ADMM-based iterative algorithm in both computational complexity and performance, facilitating the online deployment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and NetworkingSame topicAdvanced SAR Imaging TechniquesFrench-language works237,207