Path planning of 6-DOF free-floating space robotic manipulators using reinforcement learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a study on path planning for 6-DOF free-floating space robotic manipulators using Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient-based Reinforcement Learning. The focus is the development of a novel reward function tailored to address critical requirements for efficient and effective manipulation in space. These requirements include accurate pose alignment between the end-effector and the target, collision avoidance with both the target and other links of the manipulator, smoothing of joint velocities, adaptability to strong dynamic coupling between the manipulator and its base spacecraft due to high manipulator-spacecraft mass ratio, and resilience to noise in the state observations. Uniquely, the proposed reward function employs quaternions for orientation control to reduce pose misalignments and dynamic singularities, as opposed to traditional Euler angles. Our findings demonstrate that the Reinforcement Learning algorithm, when guided by this new reward function that integrates these enhancements and constraints, not only achieves the desired path planning objectives more efficiently but also exhibits faster convergence. Furthermore, the Reinforcement Learning successfully manages significant dynamic coupling effects caused by a high mass ratio between the robotic manipulator and the base spacecraft. Even under the challenge of noisy state observations, the trained agent successfully completes the path planning task, proving the Reinforcement Learning's applicability to real-space mission designs where the noise in observation is inevitable. The study highlights the critical role of reward function design in the Reinforcement Learning training process and its consequential impact on the solution quality, providing a solid foundation for future advancements in free-floating space robotic missions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".