Analyze and Construction of a Photovoltaic (PV) Power Plant Connected to the Grid to Produce Maximum Power on the Roof of the Building
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper is for technical studies and optimal selection for the angle of the panels and the feasibility of building a 20 kW power plant connected to the grid in the electricity distribution company of Tehran province with geographic coordinates of 1181 m above sea level, longitude and latitude $35^{\circ} 41^{\prime} 29{ }^{\prime \prime}, 51^{\circ} 26^{\prime} 53^{\prime \prime}$,taking into account the lack of shadow conditions and selecting the back-to-back distance in the rows of each panel for ease of maintenance and repairs and absorbing the most sunlight and producing it by photovoltaic arrays into energy and injecting it to the national grid. Also, the correct selection of electrical equipment such as inverter, panel, the optimal selection of the voltage produced by the strings compared to the working voltage of the inverter, which is one of the most important parts of the construction of this power plant.This power plant produces $35.920 \mathrm{MWh} / \mathrm{yr}$ of electricity annually and has reduced greenhouse gas emissions by 3875 Kg per month. Therefore, it can be effective in encouraging investment in the construction of these small power plants in the residential sector. and its results and the amount of production of this power plant during one year show the optimal design and construction of this solar site.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".