MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401697665 · doi:10.29327/2194248.6.2-8

A PARTIR E CONTRA FOUCAULT: AS NOVAS INJUNÇÕES DA GUERRA, DA BIOPOLÍTICA E DA SOBERANIA NA ATUAL RECEPÇÃO CRÍTICA DO PENSAMENTO FOUCAULTIANO

2024· article· pt· W4401697665 on OpenAlex
André Constantino Yazbek

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueINSTANTE · 2024
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender, Sexuality, and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este artigo examina as novas injunções do pensamento político de Michel Foucault realizadas pela atual recepção crítica dos cursos ministrados pelo filósofo no Collège de Francedurante os anos 1970. Neste sentido, o artigo pretende sublinhar, brevemente, a maneira crítica a partir da qual Christian Laval e Pierre Dardot, Éric Alliez e Maurizio Lazzarato, e igualmente Bernard Harcourt, retomam os temas da soberania, da guerra, dagovernamentalidade e do biopoder na obra de Foucault para delimitar novas formas de violência política e de gestão estatal neoliberal. O artigo também localiza as obras pioneiras de Giorgio Agamben e Achille Mbembe no que concerne a uma articulação entre biopolítica e exceção soberana. Ao fim, procuramos ainda ressaltar algumas questões gerais concernentes a esta recepção crítica atual da obra de Foucault.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.488
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.108
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it