<tt>CuGBasis</tt>: High-performance CUDA/Python library for efficient computation of quantum chemistry density-based descriptors for larger systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CuGBasis is a free and open-source CUDA®/Python library for efficient computation of scalar, vector, and matrix quantities crucial for the post-processing of electronic structure calculations. CuGBasis integrates high-performance Graphical Processing Unit (GPU) computing with the ease and flexibility of Python programming, making it compatible with a vast ecosystem of libraries. We showcase its utility as a Python library and demonstrate its seamless interoperability with existing Python software to gain chemical insight from quantum chemistry calculations. Leveraging GPU-accelerated code, cuGBasis exhibits remarkable performance, making it highly applicable to larger systems or large databases. Our benchmarks reveal a 100-fold performance gain compared to alternative software packages, including serial/multi-threaded Central Processing Unit and GPU implementations. This paper outlines various features and computational strategies that lead to cuGBasis's enhanced performance, guiding developers of GPU-accelerated code.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it