Wind Turbine Blade Fault Diagnosis: Approximate Entropy as a Tool to Detect Erosion and Mass Imbalance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wind energy is a clean, sustainable, and renewable source. It is receiving a large amount of attention from governments and energy companies worldwide as it plays a significant role as an alternative source of energy in reducing carbon emissions. However, due to long-term operation in reduced and difficult weather conditions, wind turbine blades are always seriously damaged. Hence, damage detection in blade structure is essential to evaluate its operational condition and ensure its structural integrity and safety. We aim to use fractal, entropy, and chaos concepts as descriptors for the diagnosis of wind turbine blade condition. They are, respectively, estimated by the correlation dimension, approximate entropy, and the Lyapunov exponent. Formal statistical tests are performed to check how they are different across wind turbine blade conditions. The experimental results follow. First, the correlation dimension is not able to distinguish between all conditions of wind turbine blades. Second, approximate entropy is suitable to distinguish between healthy and erosion conditions and between healthy and mass imbalance conditions. Third, chaos is not a discriminative feature to distinguish between wind turbine blade conditions. Fourth, wind turbine blades with either erosion or mass imbalance exhibit less irregularity in their respective signals than healthy wind turbine blades.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".