Digital Health as a Mechanism to Reduce Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Admissions: Retrospective Cohort Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) is costly and has been associated with financial and emotional stress among families. Digital health may be well equipped to impact modifiable health factors that contribute to NICU admission rates. Objective: The aim of the study is to investigate how the use of a comprehensive prenatal digital health platform is associated with gestational age at birth and mechanisms to reduce the risk of admission to the NICU. Methods: Data were extracted from 3326 users who enrolled in a comprehensive digital health platform between January 2020 and May 2022. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models were used to estimate the associations between hours of digital health use and (1) gestational age at birth and (2) mechanisms to reduce the risk of a NICU admission. Multivariable logistic regression models estimated the associations between (1) gestational age at birth and (2) mechanisms to reduce the risk of a NICU admission and the likelihood of a NICU admission. All analyses were stratified by the presence of any gestational conditions during pregnancy. Results: For users both with and without gestational conditions, hours of digital health use were positively associated with gestational age at birth (in weeks; with gestational conditions: β=.01; 95% CI 0.0006-0.02; P=.04 and without gestational conditions: β=.01; 95% CI 0.0006-0.02; P=.04) and mechanisms that have the potential to reduce risk of a NICU admission, including learning medically accurate information (with gestational conditions: adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.07; P<.001 and without gestational conditions: AOR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.06; P<.001), mental health management (with gestational conditions: AOR 1.06, 95% CI 1.04-1.08; P<.001 and without gestational conditions: AOR 1.03, 95% CI 1.02-1.05; P<.001), and understanding warning signs during pregnancy (with gestational conditions: AOR 1.08, 95% CI 1.06-1.11; P<.001 and without gestational conditions: AOR 1.09, 95% CI 1.07-1.11; P<.001). For users with and without gestational conditions, an increase in gestational age at birth was associated with a decreased likelihood of NICU admission (with gestational conditions: AOR 0.62, 95% CI 0.55-0.69; P<.001 and without gestational conditions: AOR 0.59, 95% CI 0.53-0.65; P<.001). Among users who developed gestational conditions, those who reported that the platform helped them understand warning signs during pregnancy had lower odds of a NICU admission (AOR 0.63, 95% CI 0.45-0.89; P=.01). Conclusions: Digital health use may aid in extending gestational age at birth and reduce the risk of NICU admission.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".