MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401705086 · doi:10.1099/jmm.0.001869

The diversity of clinical Mycobacterium abscessus isolates in morphology, glycopeptidolipids and infection rates in a macrophage model

2024· article· en· W4401705086 on OpenAlexafffund
Virginia Pichler, Lara Dalkilic, Ghazaleh Shoaib, Tirosh Shapira, Leah Rankine-Wilson, Yves‐Marie Boudehen, Joseph D. Chao, Danielle L. Sexton, Miguel Darío Prieto, Bradley S. Quon, Elitza I. Tocheva, Laurent Kremer, William Hsiao, Yossef Av‐Gay

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Microbiology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMycobacterium research and diagnosis
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
FundersUniversity of British ColumbiaAgence Nationale de la RechercheCystic Fibrosis Canada
KeywordsInfectivitySputumBiologyMicrobiologyVirulenceMycobacterium abscessusPathogenesisMacrophageMycobacteriumVirologyIn vitroImmunologyBacteriaTuberculosisPathologyMedicineVirusGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction. Mycobacterium abscessus (MABS) is a pathogenic bacterium that can cause severe lung infections, particularly in individuals with cystic fibrosis. MABS colonies can exhibit either a smooth (S) or rough (R) morphotype, influenced by the presence or absence of glycopeptidolipids (GPLs) on their surface, respectively. Despite the clinical significance of these morphotypes, the relationship between GPL levels, morphotype and the pathogenesis of MABS infections remains poorly understood. Gap statement. The mechanisms and implications of GPL production and morphotypes in clinical MABS infections are unclear. There is a gap in understanding their correlation with infectivity and pathogenicity, particularly in patients with underlying lung disease. Aim. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between MABS morphology, GPL and infectivity by analysing strains from cystic fibrosis patients’ sputum samples. Methodology. MABS was isolated from patient sputum samples and categorized by morphotype, GPL profile and replication rate in macrophages. A high-content ex vivo infection model using THP-1 cells assessed the infectivity of both clinical and laboratory strains. Results. Our findings revealed that around 50 % of isolates displayed mixed morphologies. GPL analysis confirmed a consistent relationship between GPL content and morphotype that was only found in smooth isolates. Across morphotype groups, no differences were observed in vitro , yet clinical R strains were observed to replicate at higher levels in the THP-1 infection model. Moreover, the proportion of infected macrophages was notably higher among clinical R strains compared to their S counterparts at 72 h post-infection. Clinical variants also infected THP-1 cells at significantly higher rates compared to laboratory strains, highlighting the limited translatability of lab strain infection data to clinical contexts. Conclusion. Our study confirmed the general correlation between morphotype and GPL levels in smooth strains yet unveiled more variability within morphotype groups than previously recognized, particularly during intracellular infection. As the R morphotype is the highest clinical concern, these findings contribute to the expanding knowledge base surrounding MABS infections, offering insights that can steer diagnostic methodologies and treatment approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.496

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical MicrobiologySame topicMycobacterium research and diagnosisFrench-language works237,207