MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Modified Convolutional Perfectly Matched Layers in the Presence of Moving Sources

2024· article· en· W4401719073 on OpenAlexaff
Sameh Y. Elnaggar, Yahia M. M. Antar

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceConvolutional codeAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In modern times, antennas are ubiquitous and interact in dynamic environments where they have the freedom to move in three-dimensional space. To accurately model the dynamic interactions, both frequency and time domain solvers are employed. The frequency domain solver computes fields before motion commences, while the time domain (transient) solver evolves the fields over time, accommodating the movements of antennas. The integration of both solvers becomes imperative, and in this context, we briefly delve into the necessary modifications required for the radiation boundary that models free (open) space. Our implementation incorporates Convolutional Perfectly Matched Layers (CPML), where electromagnetic fields interact with the CPML operator that is capable of effectively “absorbing” EM waves across a broad frequency spectrum and with arbitrary angles of incidence and polarizations. Traditional CPML methods assume null fields before time$t=0$; however, when initial fields are already present, such as the fields of antennas before$t=0$, their contribution should be included. This paper highlights the necessary modifications of CPML to encompass initial steady-state fields and demonstrates how the Finite Difference Time Domain (FDTD) update equations is modified by the inclusion of the initial components within the FDTD framework.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpeech and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207