Extended Kalman filter-based robust roll angle estimation method for spinning vehicles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Attitude measurement is a basic technique for monitoring vehicle motion states and safety. The spin motion of a vehicle couples the attitude angles with each other, which has an impact on the navigation and control of the vehicle. Global navigation satellite system (GNSS) signals-based roll angle measurement methods are important for vehicle attitude measurement. Most of existing studies use continuous signal power, but the case of loop lock loss leading to discontinuous power reception has not been considered. A robust estimation method for the roll angle based on the Tukey weight function is proposed to improve the measurement accuracy in cases of discontinuous reception. The characteristics of the GNSS signals, the geometric relationship between the signal power and roll angle of the vehicle are discussed. By installing a GNSS receiver with a single patched antenna on a rotating platform with a controllable rolling speed, the proposed method was verified by experiments. The robust estimation errors of different weight functions are analyzed. According to the characteristics of the gross measurement errors, a robust estimation method of multisatellite power observations is proposed to obtain a high-precision and stable estimation of the vehicle roll angle. The results show that the proposed algorithm can improve the accuracy of roll angle estimation even with gross measurement errors. As a result of the experiments, the estimation errors of the algorithm are 6.57° at a confidence level of 68 % and 15.49°at the confidence level of 95 %. In contrast, they are 11.38° and 37.31° for the traditional LS method. Moreover, the estimation accuracy of the algorithm is not significantly correlated with the vehicle rotational speed. Therefore, the vehicle roll angle can be estimated with high accuracy under a variety of rotational speeds.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".