MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401728424 · doi:10.1093/asj/sjae181

Intraoperative Systolic Blood Pressure as a Significant Predictor of Postoperative Hematoma Following Facelift: Single-Surgeon Experience of 118 Consecutive Facelifts

2024· article· en· W4401728424 on OpenAlexaff
Jad Abi‐Rafeh, Brian Bassiri-Tehrani, Adel Arezki, Charles T. Schafer, Nusaiba F. Baker, Foad Nahai

Bibliographic record

VenueAesthetic Surgery Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFacial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHematomaPerioperativeBlood pressureSurgeryIncidence (geometry)AnesthesiaPostoperative hematomaInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Although there exists ample evidence on the impact of perioperative blood pressure on hematoma incidence following facelift, the association of elevated or labile intraoperative blood pressure with postoperative hematoma remains to be explored. OBJECTIVES: The authors evaluated the association of elevated or labile intraoperative systolic blood pressure (SBP) with postoperative hematoma, based on the senior author's single surgeon experience of 118 consecutive facelifts. METHODS: A multivariate logistic regression was conducted using complete demographic, procedure-related, blood pressure-related, and outcomes-related data, with the outcome of interest representing postoperative hematoma. One-way analysis of variance and linear regression analyses were performed to assess for significant associations between a preoperative history of hypertension and a tendency to demonstrate elevated or labile intraoperative SBP. A Fisher's exact test was subsequently applied to assess for specific intraoperative SBP measurement cutoffs significantly associated with postoperative hematoma, including maximum recorded intraoperative SBP, and the specific degree of intraoperative SBP fluctuation. RESULTS: Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated no statistically significant patient- or procedure-related demographic predictors of postoperative hematoma. With aggressive treatment of preoperative hypertension, high preoperative SBP was not found to be a significant predictor of postoperative hematoma following facelift, although this approached statistical significance (P = .05). In contrast, labile intraoperative SBP (maximum recorded intraoperative SBP minus minimum recorded intraoperative SBP; P = .026) and high immediate postoperative SBP (P = .002) were both independent and statistically significant predictors of postoperative hematoma. Patients with a preoperative history of hypertension, and more specifically those with elevated SBP measurements in the preoperative clinic, were more likely to demonstrate labile (P = .007) or elevated (P = .005) intraoperative SBP during facelift surgery. Specifically, maximum recorded intraoperative SBP ≥155 mmHg (P = .045) and maximum intraoperative SBP fluctuations ≥80 mmHg (P = .036) were found to be significantly associated with hematoma. CONCLUSIONS: A multimodal approach is necessary to control perioperative systolic blood pressure within the strict <120 mmHg target demonstrated to significantly decrease hematoma incidence. The senior author's preference is for intraoperative SBP to remain within a strict 90 to 100 mmHg range. In contrast to hypertension that is aggressively treated and successfully controlled, hypertension that is difficult to control intraoperatively may be a predictor of systolic blood pressure that is difficult to control postoperatively, and therefore a significant risk factor for postoperative hematoma following facelift.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.329
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAesthetic Surgery JournalSame topicFacial Rejuvenation and Surgery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207