Deep Learning and fMRI-Based Pipeline for Optimization of Deep Brain Stimulation During Parkinson’s Disease Treatment: Toward Rapid Semi-Automated Stimulation Optimization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Optimized deep brain stimulation (DBS) is fast becoming a therapy of choice for the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). However, the post-operative optimization (aimed at maximizing patient clinical benefits and minimizing adverse effects) of all possible DBS parameter settings using the standard-of-care clinical protocol requires numerous clinical visits, which substantially increases the time to optimization per patient (TPP), patient cost burden and limit the number of patients who can undergo DBS treatment. The TPP is further elongated in electrodes with stimulation directionality or in diseases with latency in clinical feedback. In this work, we proposed a deep learning and fMRI-based pipeline for DBS optimization that can potentially reduce the TPP from ~1 year to a few hours during a single clinical visit. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: We developed an unsupervised autoencoder (AE)-based model to extract meaningful features from 122 previously acquired blood oxygenated level dependent (BOLD) fMRI datasets from 39 a priori clinically optimized PD patients undergoing DBS therapy. The extracted features are then fed into multilayer perceptron (MLP)-based parameter classification and prediction models for rapid DBS parameter optimization. RESULTS: The AE-extracted features of optimal and non-optimal DBS were disentangled. The AE-MLP classification model yielded accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and combined AUC of 0.96 ± 0.04, 0.95 ± 0.07, 0.92 ± 0.07, 0.93 ± 0.06, and 0.98 respectively. Accuracies of 0.79 ± 0.04, 0.85 ± 0.04, 0.82 ± 0.05, 0.83 ± 0.05, and 0.70 ± 0.07 were obtained in the prediction of voltage, frequency, and x-y-z contact locations, respectively. CONCLUSION: The proposed AE-MLP models yielded promising results for fMRI-based DBS parameter classification and prediction, potentially facilitating rapid semi-automated DBS parameter optimization. Clinical and Translational Impact Statement-A deep learning-based pipeline for semi-automated DBS parameter optimization is presented, with the potential to significantly decrease the optimization duration per patient and patients' financial burden while increasing patient throughput.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".