MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401748071 · doi:10.1109/jtehm.2024.3448392

Deep Learning and fMRI-Based Pipeline for Optimization of Deep Brain Stimulation During Parkinson’s Disease Treatment: Toward Rapid Semi-Automated Stimulation Optimization

2024· article· en· W4401748071 on OpenAlexaff
Jianwei Qiu, Afis Ajala, John Karigiannis, Jürgen Germann, Brendan Santyr, Aaron Loh, Luca Marinelli, Thomas Foo, Radhika Madhavan, Desmond Yeo, Alexandre Boutet, Andrés M. Lozano

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurological disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institutes of HealthNational Stroke FoundationMichael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research
KeywordsDeep brain stimulationPipeline (software)StimulationParkinson's diseaseNeuroscienceBrain stimulationArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceMedicineDiseasePsychologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Optimized deep brain stimulation (DBS) is fast becoming a therapy of choice for the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). However, the post-operative optimization (aimed at maximizing patient clinical benefits and minimizing adverse effects) of all possible DBS parameter settings using the standard-of-care clinical protocol requires numerous clinical visits, which substantially increases the time to optimization per patient (TPP), patient cost burden and limit the number of patients who can undergo DBS treatment. The TPP is further elongated in electrodes with stimulation directionality or in diseases with latency in clinical feedback. In this work, we proposed a deep learning and fMRI-based pipeline for DBS optimization that can potentially reduce the TPP from ~1 year to a few hours during a single clinical visit. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: We developed an unsupervised autoencoder (AE)-based model to extract meaningful features from 122 previously acquired blood oxygenated level dependent (BOLD) fMRI datasets from 39 a priori clinically optimized PD patients undergoing DBS therapy. The extracted features are then fed into multilayer perceptron (MLP)-based parameter classification and prediction models for rapid DBS parameter optimization. RESULTS: The AE-extracted features of optimal and non-optimal DBS were disentangled. The AE-MLP classification model yielded accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and combined AUC of 0.96 ± 0.04, 0.95 ± 0.07, 0.92 ± 0.07, 0.93 ± 0.06, and 0.98 respectively. Accuracies of 0.79 ± 0.04, 0.85 ± 0.04, 0.82 ± 0.05, 0.83 ± 0.05, and 0.70 ± 0.07 were obtained in the prediction of voltage, frequency, and x-y-z contact locations, respectively. CONCLUSION: The proposed AE-MLP models yielded promising results for fMRI-based DBS parameter classification and prediction, potentially facilitating rapid semi-automated DBS parameter optimization. Clinical and Translational Impact Statement-A deep learning-based pipeline for semi-automated DBS parameter optimization is presented, with the potential to significantly decrease the optimization duration per patient and patients' financial burden while increasing patient throughput.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.841
Threshold uncertainty score0.480

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and MedicineSame topicNeurological disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207