Digital-Twin-Empowered Resource Allocation for On-Demand Collaborative Sensing
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article introduces an on-demand collaborative sensing scheme for industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) sensors in time-varying sensing environments, aiming to optimize the sensing performance by effectively allocating communication resources for sensory data sharing. Particularly, we propose a novel digital twins (DTs)-empowered resource allocation solution to facilitate scalable and flexible collaborative sensing. First, DTs create mathematical models using real-time network data to characterize the dynamic resource demands in collaborative sensing. Second, the performance of mathematical models in DTs is evaluated through data-driven methods. Building on our DT design, we propose a joint collaborative sensing and DT management scheme to optimize the resource allocation for sensory data sharing and DT operation. Furthermore, we develop a DT evaluation method featuring a variational autoencoder to evaluate the accuracy of DTs and enable closed-loop DT-based resource allocation. Numerical results demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed collaborative sensing scheme in optimizing the sensing performance for all sensors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it