Generative Adversarial Learning for OCT-TPM Vascular Domain Translation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Modeling of microscopic cerebrovascular networks is essential for understanding cerebral blood flow and oxygen transport. High-resolution imaging modalities, e.g., Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) and Two-Photon Microscopy (TPM), are widely used to capture microvascular structure and topology. Despite TPM angiography providing better localization and image quality than OCT, its use is impractical in studies involving fluorescent dye leakage. Here, we exploit generative adversarial learning to produce high-quality TPM angiographies from OCT vascular stacks. This will serve as a complementary tool to enhance vascular analysis when only OCT imaging is involved. We investigate the use of 2D and 3D cycle generative adversarial networks (CycleGANs) trained on unpaired image samples. Our results demonstrate a successful generative ability, with a high structural similarity index (SSIM) and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), of the 2D adversarial learning over that relying on 3D learning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".