MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401750018 · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2024.1444731

Altered activation patterns of the sensory-motor cortex in patients with knee osteoarthritis during knee isokinetic movement at different speeds

2024· article· en· W4401750018 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kun Yang, Yuwu Ding, Lixi Chu, Changfeng Cheng, Xiaoming Yu, Haichen Xu, Tao Ying, Tiantian Liu, Lei Yin, Xubo Wu, Bingli Liu, Liming Jiang

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOsteoarthritisSomatosensory systemMedicineWOMACPrimary motor cortexMotor cortexCortex (anatomy)Knee JointPhysical medicine and rehabilitationPsychologyInternal medicineNeuroscienceSurgeryPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Abnormal brain activation patterns in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) at rest have been revealed, but it is unclear how brain activation patterns change during movement. This study aimed to investigate the alterations in brain activation patterns in KOA patients during knee isokinetic movement, and the correlation between cortical activity changes and pain severity and dysfunction. Methods: Eighteen patients with KOA and 18 healthy controls (HC) were recruited, and to performed the knee isokinetic test with three speeds. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) was used to detect the cerebral cortex hemodynamics changes of primary somatosensory (S1), primary motor (M1) and somatosensory association cortex (SAC) in the region of interest (ROI) during movement. Then, we evaluated potential correlations between M1, S1 and SAC values and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and visual analog scale (VAS) scores. Results: The results showed that peak torque of knee extension in KOA patients was significantly smaller than that in HC. For HC, unilateral knee movement activated bilateral ROIs. The contralateral activation was dominant, showing the phenomenon of high contralateral activation. For KOA patients, there were no statistical difference in the activation level between the left and right of the cerebral cortex, with both sides showing lower activation levels compared to HC. Further analysis found that the contralateral M1, S1, and SAC of the affected knee in KOA patients were significantly lower than those in HC, while no difference was found on the ipsilateral side. Moreover, during isokinetic movement at 180°/s, VAS score in KOA patients was negatively correlated with the activation level of the contralateral S1 and M1 values, and WOMAC was negatively correlated with the activation level of the contralateral M1 value. Conclusion: Contralateral activation of the sensorimotor cortex exists during unilateral knee movement, but in KOA patients, this contralateral cortical activation is suppressed. Furthermore, the clinical pain and dysfunction in KOA patients are associated with activation levels of specific brain regions. These findings can provide a better understanding of KOA brain science and are expected to contribute to the development of central intervention for the disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.522

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Bioengineering and BiotechnologySame topicOsteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207