ConvLoRA and AdaBN Based Domain Adaptation via Self-Training
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Existing domain adaptation (DA) methods often involve pre-training on the source domain and fine-tuning on the target domain. For multi-target domain adaptation, having a dedicated/separate fine-tuned network for each target domain, that retain all the pre-trained model parameters, is prohibitively expensive. To address this limitation, we propose Convolutional Low-Rank Adaptation (ConvLoRA). ConvLoRA freezes pre-trained model weights, adds trainable low-rank decomposition matrices to convolutional layers, and backpropagates the gradient through these matrices thus greatly reducing the number of trainable parameters. To further boost adaptation, we utilize Adaptive Batch Normalization (AdaBN) which computes target-specific running statistics and use it along with ConvLoRA. Our method has fewer trainable parameters and performs better or on-par with large independent fine-tuned networks (with less than 0.9% trainable parameters of the total base model) when tested on the segmentation of Calgary-Campinas dataset containing brain MRI images. Our approach is simple, yet effective and can be applied to any deep learning-based architecture which uses convolutional and batch normalization layers. Code is available at: https://github.com/aleemsidra/ConvLoRA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".