Towards Integrated Energy-Communication-Transportation Hub: A Base-Station-Centric Design in 5G and Beyond
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The rise of 5G communication has transformed the telecom industry for critical applications. With the widespread deployment of 5G base stations comes a significant concern about energy consumption. Key industrial players have recently shown strong interest in incorporating energy storage systems to store excess energy during off-peak hours, reducing costs and partic-ipating in demand response. The fast development of batteries opens up new possibilities, such as the transportation area. An effective method is needed to maximize base station battery utilization and reduce operating costs. In this trend towards next-generation smart and integrated energy-communication-transportation (ECT) infrastructure, base stations are believed to play a key role as service hubs. By exploring the overlap between base station distribution and electric vehicle charging infrastructure, we demonstrate the feasibility of efficiently charging EVs using base station batteries and renewable power plants at the Hub. Our model considers various factors, including base station traffic conditions, weather, and EV charging behavior. This paper introduces an incentive mechanism for setting charging prices and employs a deep reinforcement learning-based method for battery scheduling. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed ECT-Hub in optimizing surplus energy utilization and reducing operating costs, particularly through revenue-generating EV charging.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".