Atomic resolution map of the solvent interactions driving SOD1 unfolding in CAPRIN1 condensates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Biomolecules can be sequestered into membrane-less compartments, referred to as biomolecular condensates. Experimental and computational methods have helped define the physical-chemical properties of condensates. Less is known about how the high macromolecule concentrations in condensed phases contribute "solvent" interactions that can remodel the free-energy landscape of other condensate-resident proteins, altering thermally accessible conformations and, in turn, modulating function. Here, we use solution NMR spectroscopy to obtain atomic resolution insights into the interactions between the immature form of superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1), which can mislocalize and aggregate in stress granules, and the RNA-binding protein CAPRIN1, a component of stress granules. NMR studies of CAPRIN1:SOD1 interactions, focused on both unfolded and folded SOD1 states in mixed phase and demixed CAPRIN1-based condensates, establish that CAPRIN1 shifts the SOD1 folding equilibrium toward the unfolded state through preferential interactions with the unfolded ensemble, with little change to the structure of the folded conformation. Key contacts between CAPRIN1 and the H80-H120 region of unfolded SOD1 are identified, as well as SOD1 interaction sites near both the arginine-rich and aromatic-rich regions of CAPRIN1. Unfolding of immature SOD1 in the CAPRIN1 condensed phase is shown to be coupled to aggregation, while a more stable zinc-bound, dimeric form of SOD1 is less susceptible to unfolding when solvated by CAPRIN1. Our work underscores the impact of the condensate solvent environment on the conformational states of resident proteins and supports the hypothesis that ALS mutations that decrease metal binding or dimerization function as drivers of aggregation in condensates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".