MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401755437 · doi:10.3138/cras-2024-004

Taiwan Shi<i>f</i>t in Anglophone Fiction and Memoir

2024· article· en· W4401755437 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sheng‐mei Ma

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Review of American Studies · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPhilippine History and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMemoirLiteraturePhilosophyArtHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Increasingly, self-representation as “Taiwanese American writers” proliferates in authors’ notes, book blurbs, and interviews. A reprise of the white privilege in cosplaying Taiwan throughout Anglophone writings, quite a few Taiwanese American novelists Taiwanize their stories in setting, plot, location markers, and character traits. Yet this Taiwanizing in substance shares in their nostalgia over a felt loss, a loss of substance, as though Taiwan with all its visceral details is but decorative, ornamental, pointing to something beyond reach. Such implicit emptiness lies at the heart of Cindy Pon’s young adult dystopia Want set in Taipei, where yous (the haves) and meis (the have-nots) embody the master–slave hierarchy. Jessica Lee’s Two Trees Make a Forest also counteracts a family memoir of absences with scientific detachment. Jean Chen Ho’s Fiona and Jane crystallizes Taiwan shift, a reputed genesis in the island morphing restlessly from one state of being into another.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.086

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.007
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Review of American StudiesSame topicPhilippine History and CultureFrench-language works237,207