MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401756868 · doi:10.7202/1113028ar

Proposition d’un modèle logique du volet primaire du curriculum Montessori incluant les facteurs contextuels influant sur sa mise en oeuvre

2023· article· fr· W4401756868 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue des sciences de l éducation · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation Methods and Practices
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModHumanitiesMathematicsPhilosophyCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’engouement contemporain pour l’approche éducative instaurée par Maria Montessori est indéniable dans les réseaux professionnels et au sein de la communauté scientifique à travers le monde. Le corpus scientifique relatif aux effets de cette approche sur les apprenant⋅e⋅s est prometteur, mais encore exploratoire, sa principale limite méthodologique étant le manque d’évaluation de la fidélité de son implantation dans les milieux scolaires desquels sont tirés les échantillons. Pour contribuer à remédier à ce problème, cette étude propose un modèle logique du volet primaire (6 à 12 ans) du curriculum Montessori incluant les facteurs contextuels influant sur sa mise en oeuvre.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.214
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.305
GPT teacher head0.436
Teacher spread0.132 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it