MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401757058 · doi:10.7202/1113031ar

Pédagogie Montessori : l’autonomie de l’élève vue par les enseignant·e·s

2023· article· fr· W4401757058 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue des sciences de l éducation · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation Methods and Practices
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociologyPhilosophyHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La pédagogie alternative remet en question les approches traditionnelles en matière d’enseignement et d’apprentissage. Parmi les concepts qu’on y trouve, une place importante est accordée à l’autonomie de l’élève. L’approche Montessori figure parmi ces courants de pédagogie alternative et, pour cette approche, l’autonomie constitue un pilier fondamental de l’enseignement. Cet article explore la conception et la mise en oeuvre de l’autonomie de l’élève dans le cadre de la pédagogie Montessori. Une étude de cas propose ici une présentation des représentations et des pratiques d’enseignant·e·s montessorien·ne·s au Québec.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.394
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.683
GPT teacher head0.532
Teacher spread0.151 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it