MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401757160 · doi:10.7202/1113029ar

Les écoles publiques alternatives québécoises : étude d’un cas de participation parentale à la gouvernance du système éducatif

2023· article· fr· W4401757160 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Christine Brabant, Joëlle Gaudreau, Christiane Caneva, Marine Dumond

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue des sciences de l éducation · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiverse Education Studies and Reforms
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesSociologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette étude de cas vise à mieux comprendre comment des parents peuvent proposer un modèle éducatif différent pour contribuer démocratiquement à l’évolution du système éducatif. Inscrits dans le cadre théorique de la gouvernance réflexive de l’éducation, ses résultats décrivent les démarches réalisées par les parents, identifient les facteurs ayant favorisé ou contraint l’avancement de leurs projets d’écoles alternatives, selon eux, et notamment, les rôles qu’ont joué les dispositifs participatifs et décisionnels du système scolaire par rapport à ces projets, puis dégagent les apprentissages démocratiques réalisés par les parents et l’institution à travers ces interactions, du point de vue des parents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.428
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.289
GPT teacher head0.442
Teacher spread0.153 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue des sciences de l éducationSame topicDiverse Education Studies and ReformsFrench-language works237,207