Les visées expressives des parents choisissant une scolarité alternative pour leurs enfants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les parents optant pour des scolarités alternatives (écoles aux pédagogies alternatives et instruction en famille) mettent en avant des visées « expressives », ciblant une prise en compte par les adultes de ce qu’exprime l’enfant dans le cadre de son éducation (besoins, intérêts, gouts, etc.). Toutefois, ces parents témoignent d’attentes pouvant varier. Cet article s’attache à définir et à détailler les différents types de visées qui peuvent se situer derrière une même attention portée aux expressions de l’enfant. À partir de l’analyse d’un corpus de 95 entretiens avec des parents ayant choisi une scolarité alternative et de l’observation d’évènements dédiés à ce type de scolarités, nous avons pu distinguer trois variations de visées expressives : les visées d’émancipation, les visées de protection et les visées de distinction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".