Quantum-Classical-Quantum Workflow in Quantum-HPC Middleware with GPU Acceleration
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Achieving high-performance computation on quantum systems is challenging, requiring integration between quantum and classical computing resources. This study presents a distribution-aware Quantum-Classical-Quantum (QCQ) architecture that combines advanced quantum software frameworks with high-performance classical computing to improve quantum simulations for materials and condensed matter physics, including the prediction of quantum phase transitions. The architecture employs Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE) algorithms on Quantum Processing Units (QPUs) for efficient quantum state preparation, and Tensor Network states and Quantum Convolutional Neural Networks (QCNNs) on classical hardware for state classification. Utilizing the cuQuantum SDK and PennyLane's Lightning plugin, the QCQ architecture achieves up to tenfold increases in computational speed for complex phase transition classification tasks compared to traditional CPU-based methods, demonstrating 99.5% accuracy in predicting phase transitions in models like the transverse field Ising and XXZ systems. This framework integrates quantum algorithms, machine learning, and Quantum-HPC capabilities, offering transformative insights into the behavior of quantum systems across different scales. As quantum hardware continues to improve, the QCQ framework will play a crucial role in realizing the full potential of quantum computing by seamlessly integrating distributed quantum resources with state-of-the-art classical computing infrastructure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it