MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401759664 · doi:10.1038/s44276-024-00085-3

Targeting PLOD2 suppresses invasion and metastatic potential in radiorecurrent prostate cancer

2024· article· en· W4401759664 on OpenAlexafffund
Gavin Frame, Hon S. Leong, Roni Haas, Xiaoyong Huang, Jessica Wright, Urban Emmenegger, Michelle R. Downes, Paul C. Boutros, Thomas Kislinger, Stanley K. Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueBJC Reports · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicKruppel-like factors research
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health NetworkHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science Centre
FundersProstate Cancer CanadaUniversity of TorontoMovember FoundationCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchInstituto Tecnológico de Costa RicaNational Cancer InstituteNational Institutes of HealthProstate Cancer Foundation
KeywordsProstate cancerExtravasationMetastasisCancer researchGene knockdownDownregulation and upregulationCancerProstateMedicineOncologySmall interfering RNABiologyInternal medicinePathologyCell cultureTransfection

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Metastatic relapse of prostate cancer after radiotherapy is a significant cause of prostate cancer-related morbidity and mortality. PLOD2 is a mediator of invasion and metastasis that we identified as being upregulated in our highly aggressive radiorecurrent prostate cancer cell line. Methods: Patient dataset analysis was conducted using a variety of prostate cancer cohorts. Prostate cancer cell lines were treated with siRNA, or the drug PX-478 prior to in vitro invasion, migration, or in vivo chick embryo (CAM) extravasation assay. Protein levels were detected by western blot. For RNA analysis, RNA sequencing was conducted on PLOD2 knockdown cells and validated by qRT-PCR. Results: PLOD2 is a negative prognostic factor associated with biochemical relapse, driving invasion, migration, and extravasation in radiorecurrent prostate cancer. Mechanistically, HIF1α upregulation drives PLOD2 expression in our radiorecurrent prostate cancer cells, which is effectively inhibited by HIF1α inhibitor PX-478 to reduce invasion, migration, and extravasation. Finally, the long non-coding RNA LNCSRLR acts as a promoter of invasion downstream of PLOD2. Conclusions: Together, our results demonstrate for the first time the role of PLOD2 in radiorecurrent prostate cancer invasiveness, and point towards its potential as a therapeutic target to reduce metastasis and improve survival outcomes in prostate cancer patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.125
Threshold uncertainty score0.439

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBJC ReportsSame topicKruppel-like factors researchFrench-language works237,207